Sunday, February 19, 2023

Questions for change

Progress

Engage in Solidarity

What in individual life can be better?

How do we make the world better?

Find thing to WIN.

Heal ourselves

Trust each other and movement

Build community and solidarity

Obstacles:

Stratified Society 

Grift

Powergrabs


History:

Failed revolution of the 60-70s

Thursday, January 26, 2023

Sailing the Sea ... jan 2023

We are a sailor ... on a tall ship... exploring 

The sea

Images .. metaphors 

Pictures with pictures

Wish I were an artist and could draw my thoughts

or a Mathematician and plot the connections. 


The “deep state” seems to be currents that flow under the sea of politics and societies.  

There are the main currents and the wind currents

Each has an impact on the true course of a boat upon the seas.

Journalists...   the watchers, the weather forecasters and reporters.    Shut down by all 'strongman' or authoritarian governments and groups.   In the US.  SLAPP is a tool to facilitate the silence of the journalists and scribes.

Slapp     https://youtu.be/n2Qsf1r8U0I


The Family - christian power 'deep state'  players ..

Washington (RNS) — The National Prayer Breakfast is under new management, distancing the decades-old event from the secretive organization that founded it after years of controversy and a scandal that showed the yearly gathering in the nation’s capital is vulnerable to espionage.

According to a statement sent to reporters by former Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor, the prayer breakfast, whose highlight is typically a speech from the sitting U.S. president, is no longer run by The International Foundation, a Christian group more familiarly referred to as “The Family.” Instead, the 2023 breakfast, to be held this year on Feb. 2, has been coordinated by the newly created National Prayer Breakfast Foundation, which emerged “following numerous meetings in 2022,” according to Pryor’s statement.

https://pres-outlook.org/2023/01/national-prayer-breakfast-breaks-from-the-family-with-new-organization/

What is the Family?  Netflix has a documentary... Interview with Jeff Sharlet:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZU8cHsj0ucM

“The Family” is a new Netflix docuseries exploring a conservative Christian group’s connection to the Washington, D.C. Journalist Jeff Sharlet is one of the executive producers and tells Soledad how this group has remained hidden in plain sight.

Monday, November 21, 2022

 They knew -  Book Club   Ch 7  America is Purple - like a Bruise

The Great Recession birthed an unequal recovery. Big coastal cities like New York and San Francisco thrived and became unaffordable, driving out native residents through gentrification. Meanwhile, small towns, lower-class suburbs, and run-down Midwestern cities like Detroit and St. Louis—which had enjoyed a brief comeback in the late 1990s and 2000s—nearly collapsed. The Midwest’s assets were bought up by American plutocrats as well as foreign oligarchs—like Ihor Kolomoyskyy, a dual citizen of Ukraine and Israel who became the largest real estate holder in Cleveland in the recession’s aftermath. Officials either ignored or encouraged the takeover. 

In Obama’s first two years in office, both the Democrats and the Republicans bailed out Wall Street while doing little to remedy the hardship of Americans outside their donor base. In 2010, the Supreme Court upheld Citizens United, deeming corporations to be people and removing constraints on campaign financing. That ruling was a decisive moment in the movement to end America, and it was followed three years later by the Supreme Court’s partial repeal of the Voting Rights Act. Those two Supreme Court decisions stripped away what was left of American representative democracy, allowing the puppet masters to emerge from behind the curtain and flaunt their strings. 

Laws are both more formidable and more fragile than propaganda. Laws overrule the best intentions and codify the worst. Ordinary people can combat bigotry and stereotypes, and reject the contrived animosity that prejudice breeds. But once legal rights are lost, they are very difficult to recover, particularly when a key mechanism to protect them—voting—is harmed. The judiciary acts as the cage bars of autocracies. How it wields its power sets the stage for the future, overriding other avenues of liberation. 

In the United States, the new state voter suppression laws made possible by the partial repeal of the Voter Rights Act codify the tyranny of the minority into the law of the land. Republican legislatures can lock down a “red state” identity by preventing people from voting while flooding the state with dark-money propaganda as local news sources disappear. They can redraw its districts through gerrymandering so that their permanent rule is all but guaranteed. When confronted with citizen dissent, they can simply decide that certain people’s votes do not count, as Missouri did after residents state-wide—including most Republicans—voted in progressive ballot initiatives that included the protection of labor unions, an increased minimum wage, and the Clean Missouri Act, which would ban dark money in politics. The will of the majority was clear, but the Missouri GOP representatives ignored it and disregarded the measures. As Missourians struggled to defend their fading democracy, coastal pundits crowed that Missouri—once known as the bellwether state for its propensity to fluctuate between parties and reliably back the winner of the presidential election—was a “deep red state” that got the terrible policies it deserved. They went on to say the same about Texas, Georgia, and other states whose legislatures ignored the stated will of the people or created new laws to prevent or disregard their votes. The idea of a “deep red state” was a lie, part of a litany of lies. But repetition is necessary for the political elite to attain its goal. Hostile operatives want their prophecies of monolithic political cultures to prove self-fulfilling, because that will make the partitioning easier. If you keep telling people that their states—states with fluctuating populations and complex histories and vacillating political preferences—have been immutable entities since time immemorial, perhaps they will come to believe it. Perhaps they will look to the distant past—in particular, the Civil War—to justify the crises of the present, like the crisis of a government apathetic to their despair. Perhaps, in desperation, they will seek to revive what they have been told is their “true” political culture: the “good old days” that were only good for a select population. When that fails, perhaps they will see differences as irreconcilable, and back secession plans peddled by elitist plotters who would never leave their gated citadels to live in the regions they seek to dominate and destroy. These tactics are not limited to conservatives; they work on anyone. Maybe liberals will view themselves as above countrymen they have now reduced to clichés, envisioning themselves as residents of a future “blue paradise” removed from the backwards “red states”—even though the “blue states” are just further fodder for an oligarch takeover. 

Wherever you live, you must remember you are no longer a human being in this scenario. You are a pawn to push, an asset to mine, and an imposition should you grasp the plan. At every step of the way, you are seen as disposable. 

Should the red state–blue state divide reveal itself as a fallacy, operatives will reach deeper into the darkest moments of the American past for inspiration. They rewrite losers as winners, sinners as saints, and treason as triumph. This is why the GOP is working to redefine accurate history as “critical race theory”—an academic term right-wing conspirator Christopher Rufo admitted they chose to repurpose and weaponize into whatever they need it to mean at a given time. “We have successfully frozen their brand—‘critical race theory’—into the public conversation and are steadily driving up negative perceptions. We will eventually turn it toxic, as we put all of the various cultural insanities under that brand category,” Rufo wrote in March 2021. “The goal is to have the public read something crazy in the newspaper and immediately think ‘critical race theory.’ We have decodified the term and will recodify it to annex the entire range of cultural constructions that are unpopular with Americans.”19 They need the culture war to distract from the war on national security— a war that all Americans are losing, because the government has decided to forfeit its sovereignty. 

In November 2021, the Federal Election Commission ruled that it would become legal for foreigners to fund US referendum campaigns—subversion that was until recently not only reviled but illegal. Another loophole has been created to function as a noose around the neck of American democracy. 

If you want to know who owns the United States of America, follow the money—it is in offshore accounts—and monitor who pays the people rewriting the laws and marketing these policies as normal. These donors give to both parties, often in record amounts. Billionaire Len Blavatnik, for example, a USSR-born partner of sanctioned Russian oligarchs, gave millions to the Republicans until House Democrats announced in 2019 that they were investigating Trump, at which point he gave the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee the largest donation in its history. Under pressure, the DCCC returned part of the funds, but as of 2021, he is again lavishing the Democrats with money, including $50,000 for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi alone. In 2019, Blavatnik was a useful vehicle for foreign interests because his American citizenship meant that his donations were legal; now, the FEC is eliminating the need for such go-betweens. 

This crisis is not a matter of Democrats versus Republicans, or “red” versus “blue.” The crisis is a matter of people who seek to protect the United States versus elite operatives who want to destroy it. The latter are stripping down the country and selling it for parts and trying to convince ordinary Americans that it was their own idea.

Kendzior, Sarah. They Knew (pp. 164-168). Flatiron Books. Kindle Edition. 

The New Civil War is being fought so that you will forget that the Old Cold War ended as a corporate merger. Kleptocrats and oligarchs, pedophiles and criminals, technocrats and white supremacists: that is who runs what is indeed a New World Order, a phrase that merited the apprehension it provoked. Men of multiple passports, men of copious currencies, criminal elites who tell you their plots outright to test not only the limits of their own might but whether civic obligation still exists. No one powerful intervenes, no matter how blunt and blatant they get.

Kendzior, Sarah. They Knew (p. 169). Flatiron Books. Kindle Edition. 

The reality of secession and dissolution is that your countrymen—your friends and family members—are suddenly living in other countries that you may not be able to visit. The reality is a military transformed into mercenaries trading weapons and operating with brutal impunity on what used to be fellow citizens. It is the loss of basic infrastructure and it is privatization by the most corrupt actors in your region: a process already underway in the United States by operatives who know that the privatization of public goods can be accelerated by the shock tactics of partition. It means the most vulnerable people in the country—people who are not white or wealthy—will suffer even more under right-wing extremist regimes whom they did not elect and cannot control, while wealthy liberals in “blue enclaves” blame them for their fate. It means the “blue enclaves” will be invaded by the “red territories,” because no oligarch is going to let resources go unexploited. The idea that a liberal paradise will be tolerated in the Partitioned States of America is absurd; the right-wingers who treat small liberal arts colleges as major threats are not going to let actual nations rest in peace. They will raid you and then you will be one of us, only with more stigma and less recourse. There is no paradise in partition: all that will happen is that the things you hate most about America will multiply. This is true no matter who you are or what your political predilections may be.

Kendzior, Sarah. They Knew (pp. 170-171). Flatiron Books. Kindle Edition. 

When a country collapses under the weight of its own corruption, as the USSR and Yugoslavia did and as the United States seems set to do, it is common for people to say that the people of that country got what they deserved. What they usually mean is that bad actions have consequences, but we, the people, do not deserve what we have now or what may be coming. There is a great difference between what citizens bear due to the cruelty of the powerful and what they deserve as regular people who dream of more.

Kendzior, Sarah. They Knew (p. 171). Flatiron Books. Kindle Edition. 

Thursday, November 03, 2022

 They Knew..... book club.  (4) Preemptive narrative inversion

https://www.britannica.com/topic/QAnon    Origin of QAnon ..  escalation of violent propoganda...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Q-3qwEDyPM

Edward Bernays:   The father of "Public Relations"  Master of Propoganda   1916. 

Booknotes  The Father of Spin: Edward BernaysAuthor Larry Tye spoke about his book and the life and career of Edward Bernays, The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays and The Birth of Public Relations, published by Crown. Mr. Bernays was considered the founder of the public relations field.  

("If you Believe" by Jim Quin ..The Burning Platform)  If you still believe JFK was assassinated by a lone gunman; the official story of what really happened on 9/11; that Epstein killed himself and numerous celebrities, politicians, and financiers aren’t pedophiles; the Federal Reserve isn’t controlled by Wall Street; Klaus Schwab and his WEF acolytes are not trying to Reset the world where you will eat bugs, own nothing, and be happy; Bill Gates is not creating viruses and investing in vaccine makers, while buying up farmland, as part of his dream to decrease the “surplus” population; Soros is not funding the election of communists whose sole purpose is to destroy the cities and states they are running; scientific experts like Fauci are not swayed by the vast amounts of money they are paid by Big Pharma to fake their research and ignore the deaths from these products; Covid was not the weaponization of the annual flu with a billion dollar marketing campaign used to implement government control of the population, which will be expanded during the next engineered crisis; January 6th was an armed insurrection; Putin is literally Hitler and the U.S. did not blow up the Nordstream pipelines while waging a proxy war against Russia; a drug addict nudist from Berkley with a pride flag and BLM flag hanging outside his dilapidated bus is a MAGA underwear terrorist and not a male prostitute picked up by Paul Pelosi; and the Democrats are not cheating again in these 2022 mid-term elections, you are the real conspiracy theorists.

Tuesday, September 13, 2022

 Eric Jay Dolin



Videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7sGh5gYNgc

Off the Shelf: Rebels at Sea: Privateering in the American Revolution by Eric J. Dolin


History Author Talks:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6YZGuJXeJM
Roger Williams


Wooden Boat Live:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjQKWugJYCY
Join WoodenBoat editor Matt Murphy for a live interview with Eric Jay Dolin, Eric is the author of numerous histories on maritime topics, including Leviathan: The History of Whaling in America; Black Flags Blue Waters: The Epic History of America’s Most Notorious Pirates; and Brilliant Beacons: A History of the American Lighthouse. His most recent book, A Furious Sky: The Five-Hundred Year History of America’s Hurricanes, is the topic of this conversation.

https://youtu.be/9ctFodoA1dM

On June 24, the Museum of Old Newbury hosts guest speaker Eric Jay Dolin as he unravels some interesting history about American Privateers during the Revolutionary War. Dolin showcases his book "Rebels at Sea: Privateering in the American Revolution" along with real photos of the old naval ships and the crews that prized hundreds of British naval ships. Sound a lot like pirates?... Watch to find out! Don't miss the Q&A at the end. GENERAL DISCLAIMER: All opinions expressed by the Program Participants are solely their current opinions and do not reflect the opinions of NCM Hub, PortMedia, and WJOP 96.3 FM




Saturday, July 30, 2022

things fall apart

Pema Chödrön said this...
“We think that if we just meditated enough or jogged enough or ate perfect food, everything would be perfect. But from the point of view of someone who is awake, that’s death. Seeking security or perfection, rejoicing in feeling confirmed and whole, self-contained and comfortable, is some kind of death. It doesn’t have any fresh air. There’s no room for something to come in and interrupt all that. We are killing the moment by controlling our experience. Doing this is setting ourselves up for failure, because sooner or later, we’re going to have an experience we can’t control: our house is going to burn down, someone we love is going to die, we’re going to find out we have cancer, a brick is going to fall out of the sky and hit us on the head, somebody’s going to spill tomato juice all over our white suit, or we’re going to arrive at our favorite restaurant and discover that no one ordered produce and seven hundred people are coming for lunch.”
The trick is to keep exploring and not bail out, even when we find out that something is not what we thought. That’s what we’re going to discover again and again and again. Nothing is what we thought.
Things are always in transition, if we could only realize it. Nothing ever sums itself up in the way that we like to dream about. The off-center, in-between state is an ideal situation, a situation in which we don’t get caught and we can open our hearts and minds beyond limit. It’s a very tender, nonaggressive, open-ended state of affairs. To stay with that shakiness—to stay with a broken heart, with a rumbling stomach, with the feeling of hopelessness and wanting to get revenge—that is the path of true awakening. Sticking with that uncertainty, getting the knack of relaxing in the midst of chaos, learning not to panic—this is the spiritual path.
Things falling apart is a kind of testing and also a kind of healing. We think that the point is to pass the test or to overcome the problem, but the truth is that things don’t really get solved. They come together and they fall apart. Then they come together again and fall apart again. It’s just like that. The healing comes from letting there be room for all of this to happen: room for grief, for relief, for misery, for joy.”

Sunday, June 19, 2022

June 2022 - Texas Republican Party Platform

Texas Republican Party today approved platform planks rejecting 

  • “the certified results of the 2020 Presidential election, and [holding] that acting President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. was not legitimately elected by the people of the United States”; 
  • requiring students “to learn about the dignity of the preborn human,” including that life begins at fertilization; 
  • treating homosexuality as “an abnormal lifestyle choice”; 
  • locking the number of Supreme Court justices at 9; 
  • getting rid of the constitutional power to levy income taxes; 
  • abolishing the Federal Reserve; 
  • rejecting the Equal Rights Amendment; 
  • returning Christianity to schools and government; 
  • all gun safety measures; 
  • abolishing the Department of Education; 
  • arming teachers; 
  • requiring colleges to teach “free-market liberty principles”; 
  • defending capital punishment; 
  • dictating the ways in which the events at the Alamo are remembered; 
  • protecting Confederate monuments; 
  • ending gay marriage; 
  • withdrawing from the United Nations and the World Health Organization; 
  • and calling for a vote “for the people of Texas to determine whether or not the State of Texas should reassert its status as an independent nation.” 

Thursday, June 16, 2022

 Steve Bannon is DANGEROUS

from Bulwarks today... and article in Atlantic..

On today’s Bulwark podcast, I talk with the Atlantic ‘s Jennifer Senior about her remarkable new profile of Bannon: “American Rasputin”. She opens her piece by describing the extensive text exchanges she had with him. You can discern much of Bannon’s mad character and contradictions in these exchanges,” she writes. 

The chaos and the focus, the pugnacity and the enthusiasm, the transparency and the industrial-grade bullshit. Also, the mania: logomania, arithmomania, monomania (he’d likely cop to all of these, especially that last one—he’s the first to say that one of the features of his show is “wash rinse repeat”). Garden-variety hypermania (with a generous assist from espressos). And last of all, perhaps above all else, straight-up megalomania, which even those who profess affection for the man can see, though it appears to be a problem only for those who believe, as I do, that he’s attempting to insert a lit bomb into the mouth of American democracy. 

Beyond the grift, the key to understanding Bannon — and his influence on the MAGA right— is recognizing that he’s a revolutionary, who knows he doesn’t need to persuade, and who doesn’t need a majority. Bannon knows that he just needs a hard-core vanguard willing to do whatever it takes.

And his goal is to burn it all down. 

This also explains the fundamental asymmetry of our politics. On today’s podcast we discuss whether Bannon is playing checkers while his opponents are playing chess. 

But I suggested a different image: Bannon is bringing an axe to a chess game — and his opponents haven’t figured that out yet, even though he’s told us repeatedly who and what he is.

Last year, historian Ron Radosh recounted this story in the Bulwark:

Bannon spelled out his plans and strategy to me way back on November 12, 2013, at a book party held at his D.C. townhouse (the so-called “Breitbart Embassy”). 

“I’m a Leninist,” he told me as he introduced himself. He then went on, as I recounted in a 2016 Daily Beast article, to inform me that “Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.”…

I ended my article with a prediction that, sadly, has proven correct. I wrote that should Bannon succeed, there would be “a hostile takeover of the GOP.”

Beyond that, he has no coherent agenda for change, because he can’t look past the horizon of destruction. 

“There is no plan,” Senior writes. “The plan is to leave a smoldering crater where our institutions once were.”

Saturday, December 25, 2021

The plot plainly detailed. Beware 2024..... 

  THERE WAS A MEMO! The tale is a combination of “King Lear,” “Dr. Strangelove” and “A Confederacy of Dunces.” TCinLA Sep 21 19 

“Peril,” the new book from Bob Woodward and Robert Costa (which just landed on the front porch here at Le Chateau du Chat) is the gift that keeps on giving. 

Their story of the attempts Trump made to overthrow the government and remain in office are both terrifying and laugh-provoking. The tale is a combination of “King Lear,” “Dr. Strangelove” and “A Confederacy of Dunces.” 

 Other people are also taking note of this memo from former Chapman University law professor John Chapman - where he lays out the “roadmap” to the January 6 coup, had Mike Pence not discovered at the last minute what those things hanging between his legs are: 
 
This is what was proposed: 

 1. VP Pence, presiding over the joint session (or Senate President Pro Tempore Grassley if Pence recuses himself), begins to open the envelopes and count the ballots, starting with Alabama (without conceding that the procedure, specified by the Electoral Count Act, of going through the States alphabetically, is required). 
 
2. When he gets to Arizona, he announces that he has multiple slates of electors, and so is going to defer decision on that until finishing the other states. This would be the first break with the procedure set out in the Act. 

 3. At t he end, he announces that because of the ongoing disputes in the 7 States, there are no electors that can be deemed validly appointed in those States. That means “the total number of electors appointed” - the language of the 12th Amendment - is 454.Ths reading of the 12th Amendment has also been advanced by Harvard Law Professor L:awrence Tribe. A “majority of the electors appointed” would then be 228. There are at this point 232 votes for Trump, 222 votes for Biden. Pence then gavels President Trump as re-elected. 
 
4. Howls, of course, from the Democrats, who then claim, contrary to Tribe’s prior position, that 270 are required. Then Pence says fine. Pursuant to the 12th Amendment, no candidate has achieved the necessary majority. That sends the matter to the House, where “the votes shall be taken by the states, the representation from each state having one vote...” Republicans currently control 26 of the state delegations, the bare majority needed to win that vote. President Trump is re-elected there as well. 
 
5. One last piece. Assuming the Electoral Count Act process is followed, and after getting the objections to the Arizona slates, the two houses break to their separate chambers, we should not allow the Electoral Count Act constraint on debate to control. That would mean a prior legislature was determining the rules of the present one - a constitutional no-no (as Tribe has forcefully argued). So someone - Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, etc. - should demand normal rules (which includes the filibuster). That would create a stalemate that would allow the state legislatures more time to weigh in to formally support the alternate slate of electors, if they had not already done so. 

6. The main thing here is that Pence should do this without asking for permission - either from a vote of the joint session or from the Court. Let the other side challenge his actions in court, where Tribe (who conceded in 2001 that the President of the Senate might be in charge of counting the votes) and others who would press a suit would have their past position - that these are non-justiciable political questions - thrown back at them, to get the lawsuit dismissed. The fact is that the Constitution assigns this power to the vice President as the ultimate arbiter. We should take all of our actions with that in mind. 
 
Fortunately, the fact is that the Constitution DOES NOT assign this power to the Vice President. Also, the “alternative electors” from the seven states were self-appointed Republican supporters of Trump, none of whose delegations had been “deemed validly appointed” by any of the state legislatures. 

 Since far right wingers are incapable of original thought, Eastman’s reliance on Professor Tribe’s argument deserves to be commented on by Professor Tribe, who has done so: 

 “Ludicrous but scary as hell. Think 2024. Those guys mean business - even though their “law” is totally fake.” 

 The important sentence there is “Think 2024.” The changes in voting rules in the crucial Republican swing states that have been or are being put in place give the Republican-controlled state legislatures the power to overturn the popular vote result in the state, allowing them to “validly appoint electors” who would vote against the expressed will of the people in the popular vote. Provide a Republican majority in the House in 2022, and in 2024, they can find a way to try and run this, regardless of Vice President Harris being there rather than Pence. 

 The plan was perfectly, exquisitely Trumpian: 

 1.Pence should lie. 

 2. Then he should leverage his lie in order to take the election out of the hands of American voters through the exercise of an authority he doesn’t have under the Constitution. 

 The plan was first proposed to Pence on January 4 in a meeting where Eastman was present with Trump, while Trump attempted to convince Pence he had the authority to stop the certification of the election. According to Woodward and Costa, he said, "You really need to listen to John. He's a respected constitutional scholar. Hear him out." 

 Eastman already got himself in trouble, speaking at the Stop The Steal rally on January 6, with the result that he is no longer Dean of the Chapman University Law School, having “retired” at the request of the school in lieu of being forcefully separated from all his benefits from his time there. 

 He’s not a newcomer to Far Right Crazy World, where the sky is green and the grass is blue. He’s a long-time resident. Bill Kristol points out that, even though he’s been dropped at Chapman, he is still the chair of the Federalist Society’s “Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group.” But of course he would be a member of the traitorous Federalist Society. All lawyers, when they take their oath to join the bar, swear that they will “defend the U.S. Constitution, in all ways, at all times.” Federalist Society lawyers take that oath with the fingers of one hand crossed behind their back. Despite his removal as dean, Eastman still heads the Claremont Institute’s Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence 

 Eastman co-authored with Stephen Balch an article titled “How States Could Constitutionally Assume Abandoned Responsibilities of the National Government.” Balch is, if possible, even more extreme than Eastman. A former professor at Texas Tech and organizer of the National Association of Scholars, he wrote after the election: “... an audacity is now called for, a willingness to stretch institutional bonds to a degree that genuinely alarms our conniving subverters...” and made clear that there should be no restraint on actions to overturn the election, writing, “So damn the COVID, the president must now lead his followers into America’s streets and squares. They must especially flock to the capitol complexes of all the critical states and register indignant protest..” 

 They begin the article by introducing a legal “doctrine” of their own design called “protective resumption.” What they mean by this is “a resumption of the states’ reserved police powers in the face of abdication by the federal government of its own primary responsibilities.” They take quarantines and mask orders as a useful precedent for an even greater expansion of state police powers, asking “what such robust assertions of police powers could achieve, constitutionally and politically, if put to different and more legitimate ends.” 

 Helpfully, the authors make an explicit nod to the white nationalist “Great Replacement theory,” asserting that the Biden administration has “thrown open” the southern border as “part and parcel of a larger project to transform our civic order through demographic change.” 

 Embracing the audacity and divisiveness of their scheme as virtues, they write, “As in the case of any deliberately thrown gauntlet, the bolder these policies, the better.” Specifically, they think the governors of border states should declare the federal government has abandoned enforcement of the border and put their own national guard units in place, then dare the federal government to come remove them. These units would be backed up by the civilian paramilitary “militias” the Right has organized, writing,”... where they would demonstrate and provide cheer and comforts to the police and guardsmen. Demonstrations would also be mounted in major cities, making this a high intensity, media saturating, citizen-involved campaign.” 

 Make no mistake, what they are calling for is a Second Civil War. They want it. And no one in Conservative World is pushing back against this kind of thinking. If anything, the “usual suspects” are all in with this insanity. 

 While trying to understand what Trump was thinking about anything ever is next to impossible - since it’s so obvious that it’s not an activity that he engages in with sufficient practice to do it - what’s in “Peril” pretty much makes it clear that he woke up on the morning of January 6 believing that he would, in fact, be reinstated as president, that day. After Pence had told him the night before that he did not have the power to do what Trump wanted, and made El Blobbo del Mar A Lardo mad enough to come up with a 6-year old’s solution - “If you won’t do this, I won’t be your friend any more” - Trump green-lit the coup at the rally where he thought that he and his mob might pressure both the Vice President and congressional Republicans into going along. 

 The violent attack on the Capitol that followed was both part of Trump’s conspiracy to hold onto power, and an outburst of anger when he failed to hector Pence into going along with this crazy scheme. 
 Fortunately, like most other Trump ventures, it was a spectacular failure. 

 But remember: Trump is in the process of creating and reshaping a GOP that just might go along with this in 2024. All it takes is a GOP majority in the House after next year’s mid-term election. 

 I feel like my old friend, the late Hollywood Legend, who saw the Nazis for what they were, and “became a crank” on the subject of waking up to the existential threat they were. 

 Like Professor Tribe says: “These guys mean business.”

Friday, December 24, 2021

 

Saturday, July 10, 2021

 July 8th...   

Morning reads...

Heather Cox-Richardson     on the anniversary, history of the 14th amendment to the Constitution.

Equal Rights & Citizenship 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fourteenth_amendment_0

The Fourteenth Amendment contains a number of important concepts, most famously state action, privileges & immunities, citizenship, due process, and equal protection—all of which are contained in Section One. However, the Fourteenth Amendment contains four other sections. Section Two deals with the apportionment of representatives to Congress. Section Three forbids anyone who participates in “insurrection or rebellion” against the United States from holding federal office. Section Four addresses federal debt and repudiates debts accrued by the Confederacy. Section Five expressly authorizes Congress to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment “by appropriate legislation.” The states ratified the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War, along with the other Reconstruction Amendments—the Thirteenth and Fifteenth.

Then over to Jesse's Cafe for a booster shot of anger and dismay over the grift and greed of our oligarchy... "Greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction." Erich Fromm

And from there, leaping over to Covid-19 "miracle cures" and conspiracies from Orac at https://respectfulinsolence.com/   As the drip-drip-drip of negative evidence for ivermectin against COVID-19 continues to roll in, conspiracy theorists are doubling down. Why? It’s always about the grift.

The CA heat wave beckons..  so out to water the tiny garden spot and perhaps go down to the boat for a moment....  

Monday, May 31, 2021

And now, thanks to GOP extremists in state legislatures, the anti-abortion laws tightening and threaten

Let’s get info from the people who do this for a living. Sena Garven, an Ultrasound Technician says:
“So here’s the thing:
This Alabama-abortion-ban is a big deal, in a very bad way. Ohio, Missouri, Georgia, Mississippi, Arkansas, Kentucky… I’m looking at you too, but we’re going to focus on Alabama. If you’ve been living under a rock, let me catch you up. Alabama Governor, Kay Ivey, just signed a total abortion ban into law, the most restrictive law in the United States. The law will ban abortion at every stage of pregnancy for every reason.
This is not okay, not reasonable, and definitely not acceptable.
If you don’t know me well, maybe you don’t know what I do for a living. I’m an ultrasound technologist. My colleagues and I look at babies in every stage of pregnancy every day. I also work in a high risk unit. My unit and I look at babies and mothers in varying states of mental and physical health. If you think an abortion ban sounds good, then I am a good person to ask about why it isn’t.
So let me tell you:
About the woman whose baby developed with no skull, and the brain just floating around. Her baby still had a heartbeat, and she would not be able to access abortion.
About the woman whose baby has a rare chromosomal condition called T13. Her baby’s organs grew outside its body, and had a cleft palate so bad that there was no nose. She would not be able to access abortion.
About the woman whose blood pressure is spiking so high that she passes out and is likely to stroke out before her baby is born. She would not be able to access abortion.
About the woman with such a severe form of hemophilia that giving birth will probably be fatal to both her and the baby. She would not be able to access abortion.
About the 13 year old whose school isn’t allowed to teach her science-based sex-education, so she didn’t know how to prevent pregnancy or STIs, but whose body is not developed enough to carry to term without being damaged. She would not be able to access abortion.
About the woman who was raped by a friend who wanted to “make sure she got home safely”. She would not be able to access abortion.
About the woman who has PCOS so only has periods every 3-4 months and can’t find a birth control that works for her. She would not be able to access abortion.
About the woman whose abusive partner removed the condom without telling her (it’s called stealthing, and it happens more frequently than you’d think). She would not be able to access abortion.
About the woman with the cornual ectopic pregnancy that isn’t reliably in the uterus, and could grow to a size that will kill her. She would not be able to access abortion.
About the woman who has two kids she can barely feed already, and whose birth control just increased in price. She would not be able to access abortion.
About the 18 year old who just started college and is going to be the first graduate of the family if she can just stay in school. She would not be able to access abortion.
About the woman whose IUD slipped slightly and is now endangering both her and the pregnancy it was designed to prevent. She would not be able to access abortion.
About the many, many, many women who just don’t want to be pregnant for reasons that are their own. Health issues, abusive relationships, financial issues, social issues. They would not be able to access abortion.
Some of these might sound like reasonable exceptions to you. And you would be correct. But no one should get to decide what happens with another person’s body, not even to save a life. You need written permission from a corpse before life saving organs can be taken from them. You cannot be forced to donate blood, no matter how dire the situation. And no one else should get to decide what a woman does with her body, end of story.
But it’s not the end of the story, is it? Because here’s the kicker: if you consider abortion to be a murder (and some people genuinely believe that!) then miscarriage can be second degree murder. And this is already happening all over the world - El Salvador, Ecuador, and the US of A. Women are being jailed for miscarriages and stillbirths because they might have done something to cause it. If you start down this path of jailing women and doctors for making healthcare decisions that affect no one but themselves, then you get women who don’t go to a doctor for a safe procedure and instead order pills online or use whatever metal instruments they can find to end their own pregnancies. Women who are honestly experiencing a miscarriage (which is medically called a spontaneous abortion, just fyi) will not go to their doctor for help. They will bleed out on their bathroom floors or die of septic shock. And I haven’t even talked about how this will disproportionately affect women of color, LGBTQA+ women, or trans men. This isn’t about the “sanctity of life” anymore. It’s about controlling women.”
Sena Garven

Noam Chomsky - 10 media manipulation strategies

Noam Chomsky, one of the most important intellectuals in life today, has drawn up the list of 10 media manipulation strategies.
1-The strategy of distraction
The primordial element of social control is the distraction strategy which consists of diverting the public's attention from major problems and the changes decided by political and economic elites, through the flooding technique or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information.
Distraction strategy is also essential to prevent the public from becoming interested in essential knowledge in the area of science, economics, psychology, neurobiology and cybernetics. Keeping the audience's attention deviated from real social problems, imprisoned by themes without real importance.
Keeping the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think, back to the farm like other animals (quoted in the text ′′ Silent weapons for quiet wars ′′).
2-Creating problems and then offering the solutions.
This method is also called a ′′ problem-reaction-solution ". It creates a problem, a ′′ situation ′′ planned to cause a certain reaction from the public, with the aim that this is the source of the measures they want to accept. For example: letting urban violence intensify or intensify, or organize bloody attacks, with the aim of the public being those requiring security laws and policies to the detriment of freedom. Also: create an economic crisis to make social rights demotion and dismantle public services accept as a necessary evil.
3-The Strategy of Graduation.
To make an unacceptable measure accepted, you only need to apply it gradually, to dropper, for consecutive years. This is how radically new socioeconomic conditions (neoliberism) were imposed during the decades of the 80 s and 90 s: minimum state, privatisation, precariousness, flexibility, mass unemployment, wages that no longer guarantee dignified incomes , so many changes that would have brought about a revolution if they were implemented at once.
4-The Strategy of Deferring.
Another way to get an unpopular decision accepted is to present it as ′′ painful and necessary ", gaining public acceptance, in the moment, for future application. It is easier to accept a future sacrifice than an immediate sacrifice. First, because effort isn't that taken immediately. Second, because the public, the mass, always tends to naively hope that ′′ everything will be better tomorrow ′′ and that the required sacrifice could be avoided. This gives the audience more time to get used to the idea of change and accept it resigned when the time comes.
5-Reach to the public like children.
Most advertisements directed at the large audience use speeches, arguments, characters and a particularly childish intonation, many times close to weakness, as if the viewer was a few years old creature or a mental moron. When you try to deceive the viewer the more you tend to use a childish tone. Why? Why? ′′ If someone addresses a person as if they are 12 or under, then based on suggestionability, they will probably tend to a response or reaction even without a critical sense like that of a 12 person. years or less ′′ (see ′′ Silent Weapons for quiet wars ′′).
6-Using emotional aspect much more than reflection.
Take advantage of emotion it's a classic technique to provoke a short circuit on a rational analysis and finally the critical sense of the individual. Additionally, the use of emotional register allows the unconscious access door to implant or inject ideas, desires, fears and fears, compulsions, or induce behaviors.
7-Keeping the public in ignorance and mediocrity.
Making the public incapable of understanding the technologies and methods used for their control and slavery.
′′ The quality of education given to lower social classes must be as poor and mediocre as possible, so that the distance of ignorance that plans between lower classes and upper classes is and remains impossible to fill from the lower classes ".
8-Stimulating the public to be complacent with mediocrity.
Pushing the audience to think it's fashionable to be stupid, vulgar and ignorant...
9-Strengthening self-guilt.
Making the individual believe that he is only the culprit of his disgrace, because of his insufficient intelligence, skills or efforts. So, instead of rebelling against the economic system, the individual devalues himself and blames himself, which in turn creates a depressive state, one of whose effects is the inhibition of his action. And without action there is no revolution!
10-Knowing individuals better than they know themselves.
Over the past 50 years, science's rapid progress has generated a growing gap between public knowledge and those possessed and used by dominant elites. Thanks to biology, neurobiology, and applied psychology, the ′′ system ′′ has enjoyed advanced knowledge of the human being, both in its physical and psychological form. The system has managed to learn better about the common individual than he knows himself. This means that, in most cases, the system exercises greater control and greater power over individuals, greater than that which the same individual exercises over himself.
 
See original
 
Rate this translation
349
182 Shares
Like
Share

Questions for change

Progress Engage in Solidarity What in individual life can be better? How do we make the world better? Find thing to WIN. Heal ourselves Trus...